WaterMark
Data Center Water Impact Assessment Tool

WaterMark / Jurisdictions / Bexar County, TX (San Antonio)

Bexar County, TX (San Antonio): Data Center Water Impact

Reference data for evaluating a data center proposal in Bexar County, TX (San Antonio). Every figure below is a stored value with its primary source attached. Facility-scale results are produced by the assessment tool.

Water supply

MetricValueSource / basis
Water utilitySan Antonio Water System (SAWS)Utility of record
Supply sourceEdwards Aquifer + diversified portfolioUtility of record
Treatment capacity320 MGDWater stress: WRI Aqueduct 4.0, HUC-8 12100301. Edwards Aquifer is sole-source — drought triggers cut municipal supply.
Water rate$4.20 / 1,000 galSan Antonio Water System (SAWS) published rate schedule
Watershed stressExtremely High (4.2 / 5)Water stress: WRI Aqueduct 4.0, HUC-8 12100301. Edwards Aquifer is sole-source — drought triggers cut municipal supply.

Watershed consumptive use

Basin: San Antonio (HUC-8 12100301). Figures are consumptive use, not withdrawal, because evaporative data center loss is consumptive. USGS data year 2020.

CategoryConsumptive use (MGD)Share of basin
Residential 200 74.1%
Thermoelectric power 25 9.3%
Industrial 15 5.6%
Irrigation 25 9.3%
Mining 2 0.7%
Existing data centers 3 1.1%
Total270100.0%

Total is the sum of the categories listed above. Shares are each category divided by that total. Source: USGS Water Use 2020, Bexar County. Edwards Aquifer Authority.

Grid generation water (Scope 2)

Generating the electricity a data center consumes evaporates water at the power plant. That volume is real, it is attributable, and it is excluded from most corporate "water positive" accounting. On a thermal grid it is frequently comparable to the facility's own cooling water.

MetricValueSource / basis
Grid regionERCOTERCOT
Electric utilityCPS EnergyUtility of record
Grid water intensity0.22 gal / kWhMacknick et al. 2012 × ERCOT mix
Local peak demand4,500 MWERCOT
Modeled rate impact4% to 10%See methodology

Where this water is consumed: CPS Energy operates plants near San Antonio; some Scope 2 water occurs locally.

Run this county at your facility size. The assessment tool computes direct (Scope 1) and indirect (Scope 2) water for a specific load, cooling system, and mitigation stack, with the same citations attached.

Open Bexar County, TX (San Antonio) in the assessment tool

Reducing the footprint here

A high stress reading is a design constraint, not a verdict. Closed-loop and dry or hybrid cooling, adiabatic assist, immersion, and reclaimed or non-potable sourcing each move the direct number, and siting against a cleaner grid mix moves the indirect number. The solutions catalog lists each option with its water reduction, its energy and cost tradeoff, and its source.

Regulatory and siting status

San Antonio. Edwards Aquifer is sole-source — significant constraints. Drought triggers cut municipal supply. Statewide: on 3 Aug 2026 the Governor directed the PUCT and ERCOT to audit every data center in the interconnection queue before any further project may advance, and ERCOT paused its Batch Zero study. The audit requires each project to disclose projected annual and peak water consumption, water sources, and cooling technology.

Sources: Water: SAWS. Edwards Aquifer Authority. Grid: ERCOT. Statewide audit: Office of the Governor, 3 Aug 2026.

Comparative siting scores for this county, alongside every other county tracked, are on the US Siting Matrix.

CountyWater sourceWatershed stress
Williamson County, TX (Austin metro) Brazos River + Edwards Aquifer + reservoirs High (4/5)
Denton County, TX (DFW) Trinity River High (3.5/5)

How these numbers are derived

Assumptions, formulas, and the full source list are in the methodology. WaterMark is published by Standard Water Corp and is not affiliated with any data center developer, utility, or government agency.